Are you one of them that uses competitive pricing? How sure are you that you’re not falling into the commoditisation trap? Are you in control of profitability or are your competitors the ones driving your profitability?

 

Many businesses implement competition based pricing strategies and tactics. The assumption is that, the price of their products and services is set by an equilibrium in the market. Like for instance, that the market will eventually decide the right price for your products and services.

 

However, applying this traditional economic principle when markets are extremely volatile and highly competitive is fraught with risk. Thus, leading to inevitable margin erosion and commoditisation.

 

1. Market equilibrium is constantly shifting. Most businesses do not have advanced price analysis and or competitive pricing intelligence systems (or even mindset) to track, monitor and adjust to key shifts in the market.

2. Today’s pricing teams are still largely focused on price administration. In turn, struggle to interpret patterns of variability in the market that would otherwise drive profitability for the business.

3. Business and pricing strategy are oftentimes based on simplistic cost-plus and competitive pricing methodology. Oftentimes, it fails to explain the differences in revenue and margin by product and customer segment.

 

Classical economic theory was fine when markets were more stable. In 2017 and onwards, we need to adapt our thinking and break away from routine economic and management principles.

 

In this article, we will evaluate competitive based pricing. Also, identify the possible difficulties you may face as you develop your competitive pricing strategy for each segment and product. We will also provide a series of recommendations and alternatives throughout this article. This will help you and your team think beyond the day to day tactics of competitive pricing setting scenarios.

 


Table of Contents:

I. Competitive based pricing: Falling into the commoditisation trap?

II. Competition based pricing: Monte Carlo methods in B2B & B2C pricing

III. Competitive Pricing: 7 Steps For Pricing In The Age Of Digital Disruption


 


 


Competitive based pricing: Falling into the commoditisation trap?


 

What is competitive based pricing?

 

Competitive pricing means setting your prices at the same (equivalent/parity pricing), slightly higher or slightly lower than your competitors. Your pricing team will set an initial item price by examining a competitor’s or group of competitors’ prices. This process is known as competition-based pricing.

 

Competitive based pricing is complex: Coca-Cola Case study

 

In a highly competitive market, oftentimes, when you start the competitive based pricing process, you will find multiple prices for an item product or service. A large variation in price created by competitive based pricing is otherwise known as price dispersion. An example of price dispersion resulting from competitive pricing is Coca-Cola (see interesting article on the early pricing history of Coke).

 

Coca-Cola operates in a highly competitive market consisting of similar and substitutable products. Coke as a single item can be bought for $0.59 or nearly as much as $5.00. There are a number of price points for Coke in the marketplace (even between neighbouring retail stores). Yet, the product remains unchanged even after years and years of production.

 

If we assume that the B2C Coca-Cola pricing team in APAC is implementing competitive based pricing for Coke, then Coke’s competitive pricing process would begin. For instance, by trawling through large amounts of competitive price information and data available to determine the initial price point for competing retailers across multiple segments.

 

If we also assume that the APAC Coke pricing team does not have pricing software tools to automate their competitive pricing process, then the above competitive pricing process would be largely manual. Requiring pricing analysts to input and change prices weekly or monthly in the system to remain competitive in the market.

 

The Coca-Cola case study above illustrates the administrative pricing complexity associated with competitive pricing.

 

We commonly see pricing teams devolving into reactive and operational decision-making.

 

The reason is, they’re tracking competitors closely that they don’t have time to think about the wider market and positioning. Simply managing price dispersion created by competitive pricing across segments and products will reduce profit.

 

Key pricing questions: What are the drivers of pricing power for Coke? Does the market really control pricing power for Coke or it is something else driving price?

 

Resolving pricing complexity with a competitive pricing strategy

 

Often pricing teams get around the complexity of vast competitive price information by focusing on only the highest marketplace prices. Sometimes, on only the lower or only in the middle of the competitive price range. Some businesses also select a group of competitors and apply the above competitive pricing method of setting their initial prices by product and segment.

 

In all cases, it is important for pricing teams to supplement their competitive pricing methods with customer and competitor information. Such as costs, strategies, elasticities, profit levels and other elements of competitive pricing intelligence. However, most businesses have large gaps in their data architecture and analytics. They cannot generate meaningful insights on either the customer or the competitor. Consequently, businesses are forced to make assumptions about their competitors and consumer behaviour without fully qualifying and validating this with evidence.

 

The problem with a competitive pricing strategy

 

When businesses do not have enough information to supplement and qualify their assumptions on consumer and competitive behaviour, they tend to assume that their competitors are like them. Consequently, pricing options (and understanding of trade-offs) become limited with their own match to market thinking.

 

However, what if your competitors know even less about the impact of pricing on the market than you? What if they don’t have an accurate gauge on their cost base? What if they do not understand their customer base and or demand pricing and are actually following you? Every business is different in terms of their CAPEX, supply, strategy and vision for the future. Don’t assume your competitors are like you.

 

Conclusion

 

Competitive based pricing strategy and tactics can often miss the subtle variations in the market. In turn, don’t always account for the differences in revenue, contribution margin, cost to serve, value by segment and product.

 

A highly manual competitive pricing process and static pricing model based on basic market assumptions and arbitrary price differentials will expose the business to risk in highly transparent markets.

 

A competitive pricing strategy and tactical program are reliant on a sophisticated price ecosystem:

 

Example: sophisticated price data architecture, centralised analytics, pricing optimisation algorithms, robust competitive intelligence tools, a sophisticated value-based segmentation framework and a high-performing pricing team. Even if one of these pieces are missing, profits will decline.

 

Once your price ecosystem is set up properly, make sure your team is given the tools and techniques to think strategically. Even tactical teams need to think strategically in order to produce viable price options for each segment and product category.

 

If you decide you want to build a team based on a competitive pricing process, we recommend one pricing manager and four supporting analysts for every $500M+ to manage and implement effectively the competitive pricing review and associated price information and follow up implementation plan.

 

If you only implement competitive pricing methodology in your business, we highly recommend broadening your skills and knowledge base with alternative pricing options. Most notably customer and value-based pricing methodology and price optimisation analytics.

 

See our blog on why price gouging is nearly always a bad idea. For yet more on Coke – see our blog on price acceptance when reducing can sizes.

 

⇑ Table of Contents


〉〉〉 Contact Us for a FREE Consultation〉〉〉



 

Competition based pricing


Competition based pricing: Monte Carlo methods in B2B & B2C pricing


 

(Note: This article was originally published by Ranson Pricing on 25th January 2017. You can find the original article here as well as numerous other informative articles.)

 

In the mobster film Casino, smooth operator Ace Rothstein says “the cardinal rule is to keep them playing and to keep them coming back – the longer they play the more they lose, and in the end we get it all”.

 

In games like roulette, dice and slot machines, each player’s winnings are subject to the luck of the draw.

 

But since casinos serve many players, profits average out. Monte Carlo methods, named after the famous gambling hub, aggregate similar random effects to model deterministic outcomes. It can be extremely effective in competition-based pricing.

 

Why consider competition-based pricing such as Monte Carlo methods?

 

Offering goods for sale at a particular price point comes with a certain probability of success for each potential customer. Whatever the price level, there will always be some customers who decide to buy and some who do not.

 

In B2C environment, this means that a certain proportion of a large number of customers can be expected to buy.

 

Monte Carlo methods help determine the competition based pricing level that optimises profitability given the large number of customers each buying relatively small amounts.

 

In B2B, things are slightly different because each client will be buying significant amounts of the product in question. (B2B markets where end-users that are businesses behave like individual consumers are considered B2C for the purposes of this article).

 

But Monte Carlo methods are still helpful for facilitating the management decision of what competition-based pricing has to offer in a competitive tender process as they can estimate (a) the probability of success of one particular contract at each price point and (b) optimise revenue over a number of contracts tendered for over the medium to long terms.

 

What are the essential components of a Monte Carlo model

 

At the heart of a Monte Carlo model is a random number generator (“RNG”). Best practice in this area involves going out to a quiet, dark place to measure atmospheric noise and commercial solutions are available. But don’t forget that Excel has an RNG and in many cases, this is probably sufficient.

 

In a pricing context, RNGs can be used to create and evaluate a wide range of scenarios. Also, see how likely it is that each will materialise. Whether you use a hundred, a thousand or a million such scenarios will depend upon the nature of your business. Including the data you have available and the tools at hand.

 

At Ranson Pricing, we recommend keeping it simple. Especially at first, as stakeholders will need convincing of the technique’s merits before further development. Incorporating more sophisticated statistics is likely to be of value.

 

What does a Monte Carlo model’s output look like?

 

At Ranson Pricing, we believe that the best practice in B2C Monte Carlo modelling leads to a “cloud” of probabilities showing the chance of achieving particular market shares at each price point.

 

In B2B, Monte Carlo models can be used for short term and long term benefits.

 

For the short term, they can show the probability that a bid will succeed at each individual price point. For the long term, they can highlight pricing strategies that optimise profitability across a large number of contracts.

 

Who can use Monte Carlo methods?

 

Monte Carlo methods are applicable to pricing in almost any industry, even (especially) when this type of method is not common practice. Airlines, hotel operators, other travel service providers, retailers, entertainment venue operators, manufacturers, professional service providers, pharmaceutical developers, software houses, like Ace Rothstein have customers who play again and again.

 

Conclusion

 

Monte Carlo pricing is certainly not for beginners – and is a huge step up over market strategies such as setting the price based on total cost markups or price matching.

 

This technique is certainly in the realms of advanced strategic pricing and is a pricing method dependent on your target audience.

 

Like other techniques in pricing, Monte Carlo methods can help secure and build revenue streams to profitably deliver products and services that only get better over time.

 

See our blogs on revenue management and dynamic pricing.

 

 

⇑ Table of Contents


〉〉〉 Contact Us for a FREE Consultation〉〉〉



 

Competitive pricing


Competitive Pricing: 7 Steps For Pricing In The Age Of Digital Disruption


 

If platforms have not disrupted your industry yet, it’s probably only a matter of time before they do.

 

Platform businesses are disrupting the traditional business landscape and competitive pricing across many different industry sectors (Agriculture, Communication and Networking, Education, Energy, B2B Industrial, Finance, healthcare, Gaming, Labour & Professional services, Logistics and Delivery, Operating systems, Retail, Transportation and Travel).

 

Some of the world’s biggest firms have or are being displaced by platforms.

 

Industries are being altered too. The platform revolution has begun and it is fundamentally changing the role of business and price leadership. How are you responding? Is it creating different pricing strategies? John Deere, Siemens, Philips, General Electric, McCormick Foods are some examples of businesses taking positive action to adapt to a platform-driven world. Siemens, for example, is in the process of converting their machines to a platform.

 

They want network machines to stream data into a central platform so that they eventually interact and learn from one another. Siemens platform is dramatically reducing product failure while increasing customer satisfaction.

 

It is also driving the business closer to a new and better-operating model embedded within a value organisation.

 

In my last article on organisational design: ‘Supporting your teams through a pricing transformation, we discussed how a traditional logistics company restructured the business to generate more value for the business and its customers.

 

In this article, we will discuss 7 techniques a traditional business can use to keep up with the rate of change and disruption to a competitive pricing strategy created by the platform revolution.

 

The central premise is that all businesses (traditional B2B & B2C + platform-based businesses) must build a culture and mindset focused on the exchanges of value occurring within their wider value ecosystem in order to influence value and pricing in an age of digital disruption (such as internet of things).

 

A focus on value turns businesses inside out

 

In the past traditional businesses like Staples (corporate supplies and services) and FedEx have scaled by buying upstream suppliers or downstream distributors (otherwise known as vertical integration).

 

While other traditional businesses like DHL have expanded by pushing more value through their supply chain; and or like so many FMCG and retailed businesses have done, creating new products, category lines and brands (otherwise known as horizontal integration).

 

However, growth does not just come from horizontal integration and vertical integration. Forward-thinking traditional businesses like IBM, L’Oreal and Tesco, for example, are working out how functional integration can transform their commercial strategy.

 

Functional integration means building scalable business models with networked data tools, software, products and services and customer feedback loops.

 

Implementing functional integration involves: analysing which territory to expand to and what data-driven technology configuration they can deploy. It is also dependent on attracting and recruiting the best talent and embracing agile teamworking methodology and the right habits.

 

Conquer and transform conventional commercial strategy and competitive pricing position

 

Value-based organisational design can be daunting. Designers and builders of value organisations can often find it difficult to identify a logical starting point. There can be a lot of moving parts and connections to make when re-aligning your teams to value.

 

Below are 7 techniques used by some of the most successful businesses in the world (both traditional B2B and B2C businesses and recent platform businesses) to build value-based organisations.

 

1. Understand customers value drivers

 

The focus for the modern redesign is shifting to the business’ value chain. GE for example, have a huge value ecosystem in which they operate. They continually seek to identify and delineate all the connection points within their value ecosystem so that they are not left wondering about their value positioning.

 

They test, trial and adapt organisation structures. Also, they seek to understand the information and data gathered from their platform. In addition, they piece together data and insights to figure out the best ways to align their people to a value-based commercial strategy and work out competitive pricing proposition.

 

2. Focus on activities that directly deliver value for your customers

 

Certain activities are crucial to delivering each of the value drivers in your organisation’s ecosystem – pricing is one of them. The pricing, sales and marketing functions and activities must be sponsored by the CEO and company and given the greatest possible resources.

 

Procter and Gamble, for example, have been closely monitoring which organisational functions generate the most value for the business and then shifting internal resources accordingly. Innovation is moving away from in-house R & D to open innovation.

 

The business is thinking less in terms of accounting and cash flow management and moving towards price and value management. They are now seeking executives with the ideas and skills to tap new sources of demand and supply.

 

They are building teams with the capability to understand and influence consumer behaviour using positive network effects and an advanced price and value management capability.

 

3. Innovate your monetisation model

 

Functional integration does not happen overnight, even forward-thinking platforms like Alibaba, Waster and Uber are wrestling with how they can deliver higher levels of value while monetising the value they generate for users.

 

How do you grow, scale and monetise value without creating an expectation for freemiums?

 

Whirlpool is rethinking monetisation (competitive pricing) by charging users for the value that the platform technology creates for those users in 4 ways:

 

    • For consumers: access to value created on the platform
    • Producers or third party providers: access to a community or market
    • Both consumers and producers: access to tools and services that facilitate interaction
    • For both consumers and producers: access to curation mechanisms that enhance the quality of interactions.

 

4. Use agile methods to generate action quickly

 

Business models, organisational structures and even platforms create boundaries and restrictions to growth and wealth creation. It is important to test and experiment team structures and evaluate whether you will be able to link functions to specific activities designed to achieve complex pricing outcomes.

 

5. Re-evaluate leadership & the skills required to build a value-driven organisation

 

Business management skills are changing. An increasing number of leadership activities now involve influencing both consumers and employees. A key leadership skill will be strategically influencing communities, data, assets as well as teams to drive scale and growth for the business and the ecosystem in which it operates.

 

6. Ensure CEO sponsorship of the talent management process

 

CEOs who sponsor a value organisation take talent management very seriously. Qantas CEO, Alan Joyce, for example, hires pricing professionals from across the world to build his value-based pricing function in Australia. He takes a very proactive approach to build talent pipelines and views talent as one of his top priorities. Talent management is an investment in future growth. Without the right people on board, your plans for growth will not go far.

 

7. Build a competitive pricing team with the right capabilities

 

Conventional recruitment practices are costly and often long, drawn-out processes. More often rushed and transactional. Also, selection decisions are subjective. Cognitive biases are factors that influence it. They are more likely to lead to bad hires.

 

Conventional recruitment practices also have a higher chance of delaying or even jeopardising your business plans. They often lack insight into specialist skills, new trends and complex commercial challenges.

 

You want a rare balance of technical and soft skills to help you drive successful consumer-driven commercial strategies to the market. A successful value organisation depends on a sophisticated recruitment capability, people analytics and dedicated training and development (usually this includes a comprehensive 100-day development plan to accelerate productivity and establish the right team habits from day 1).

 

Conclusion

 

Building a business ecosystem, rather than building scale and market share through classic M&A is fast becoming the best source of competitive advantage and market dominance. Our customer’s traditional drivers of value have become more unique and the various combinations of value that each customer requires have become more complex.

 

Re-aligning the business and your people on external sources of value and supply means that managing wealth creation outside the organisation is now a key leadership skill. A critical part of designing a new structure and or implementing a platform will inevitably challenge traditional team and leadership structures.

 

Positioning exceptional price leaders within your executive leadership team will prepare you for the demands of change created by platforms and data analytics. Pricing, platforms and business model adaptation are all inextricably linked to the exchanges of value within the business’ wider value ecosystem.

 

A high functioning pricing organisation should have an in-depth understanding of its customer base and what they value about the business. It makes sense that the pricing function is contributing to the development of a platform-based business to help you achieve your long term strategic objectives. The question is: Do you have leaders and teams with the capability to strengthen the cultural norms and skills required to achieve your competitive pricing vision for the future?

 

Click here to download the whitepaper.

 

 

⇑ Table of Contents

 

Click here to download the whitepaper


〉〉〉 Contact Us for a FREE Consultation〉〉〉


 

Pricing College Podcast