Key Takeaways
- John Deere’s shift toward software, data, and subscriptions reflects a broader move to outcome based pricing in industrial manufacturing.
- Manufacturers are increasingly charging for the productivity their products deliver rather than the products themselves.
- Customers may accept paying for measurable outcomes, but they may also question why capabilities they once owned now require ongoing fees.
- Outcome based pricing may shape the future of B2B, but customer acceptance remains the biggest uncertainty.
How Outcome Based Pricing Is Reshaping Industrial Manufacturing
Outcome based pricing is becoming one of the most significant trends in industrial manufacturing. John Deere is generating more revenue from software, data, connectivity, and productivity services. The company is expanding beyond its traditional role as an equipment manufacturer and strengthening its position in digital agriculture. Connected technologies, automation, precision farming tools, and subscription-based services are becoming increasingly important parts of the business.
This is not simply a John Deere story. It reflects a broader shift across industrial manufacturing. More companies are looking to monetise the outcomes their products create rather than relying solely on product sales.
That raises an important question. Will customers continue paying for productivity gains, or will they begin questioning why capabilities they once considered part of ownership now come with an ongoing fee?
Read This CEO Pricing Strategy To Improve Margin & EBIT
Why Outcome Based Pricing Is Replacing Traditional Product Pricing
For decades, industrial manufacturers relied on product sales to generate revenue. A machine was sold, ownership transferred, and the transaction was largely complete.
The challenge is that equipment sales are often unpredictable. Revenue depends on replacement cycles, economic conditions, capital expenditure budgets, and customer confidence. When customers delay purchases, manufacturers can face significant revenue pressure.
As a result, many industrial businesses are searching for more stable income streams. Investors also favour recurring revenue because it provides greater visibility and predictability. This helps explain why manufacturers are looking beyond the initial sale.
John Deere’s shift highlights this reality. Selling more equipment every year becomes increasingly difficult in mature markets. To sustain growth, manufacturers are exploring ways to generate revenue without relying entirely on additional machine sales.
See whether your pricing is under control
The Shift Towards Measurable Results
Historically, manufacturers sold physical products. Customers purchased tractors, excavators, machinery, or equipment because of their features and capabilities.
Today, the conversation is changing.
Customers increasingly care about results. They want lower operating costs, reduced downtime, improved efficiency, higher yields, better resource utilisation, and stronger productivity. Technology now allows manufacturers to track, measure, and influence many of these outcomes long after the equipment is sold.
This creates a significant pricing opportunity.
Rather than charging solely for the machine, manufacturers can charge for the productivity it helps create. John Deere’s precision agriculture technologies reflect this approach. The value proposition is no longer simply ownership of a tractor. It is improved performance and efficiency supported by data-driven insights and connected services.
From a pricing perspective, this represents a major transformation. The discussion moves away from product specifications and towards measurable business outcomes.
Cost Past Through in Volatile Markets: What CEOs Need to Do Now - Podcast Ep. 122!
The Challenge of Charging for Productivity
At first glance, charging for outcomes appears logical.
If a customer receives greater value, why should they not pay for it?
However, the reality is more complicated.
A physical product is relatively easy to understand. Customers can inspect it, compare it, and evaluate its performance. Productivity is different. It can be difficult to define, measure, and verify.
One customer may achieve substantial gains from a technology platform, while another may see only modest improvements. The same service can produce different results depending on how it is used.
There is also a timing challenge.
Customers experience subscription costs immediately, while productivity gains often emerge gradually. The invoice arrives today, but the promised benefits may take months to become visible.
This creates uncertainty. Customers may begin asking whether they are paying for genuine value or simply paying extra for capabilities that should already be included in the product.
That question is becoming increasingly important as more businesses adopt outcome-focused pricing models.
When Pricing Becomes a Trust Issue
The greatest risk may not be the price itself.
The greater risk is customer perception.
Most customers accept paying more when they clearly understand the value they receive. Problems emerge when they believe existing value is being repackaged and sold back to them.
This is where the ownership debate begins.
Historically, purchasing equipment meant purchasing its capabilities. Today, some capabilities are tied to software subscriptions, connectivity packages, data platforms, and ongoing service agreements.
From a manufacturer’s perspective, these services create additional value and require ongoing investment. From a customer’s perspective, the distinction may not always be clear.
As a result, customers may begin questioning where ownership ends and recurring charges begin.
The conversation shifts away from productivity and towards fairness.
Businesses that fail to recognise this risk may encounter growing customer resistance. What begins as a strategy to monetise outcomes can quickly become a trust issue.
See how pricing breaks in practice
Why More Industrial Companies Are Adopting Outcome Based Pricing
Despite these challenges, industrial manufacturers continue moving towards outcome based pricing.
The commercial logic is difficult to ignore.
Software and services often generate higher margins than equipment sales. Recurring revenue is more predictable than one-off transactions. Connected technologies also make customer performance easier to monitor, analyse, and improve.
Technology enables manufacturers to remain involved throughout the customer relationship rather than only during the initial sale.
This creates opportunities to generate ongoing revenue while strengthening customer engagement.
John Deere is not alone. Similar trends are emerging across manufacturing, construction, mining, logistics, and industrial services. Businesses across these sectors are exploring ways to monetise performance, efficiency, automation, and operational improvements.
The direction is becoming increasingly clear.
Manufacturers want to be paid for outcomes, not just products.
〉〉〉 Get Your FREE Pricing Audit 〉〉〉
Will Customers Accept Outcome Based Pricing?
John Deere’s shift towards software, data, and subscriptions highlights one of the most significant pricing transformations taking place across industrial manufacturing.
The future of B2B pricing may be less about selling products and more about charging for the productivity those products create.
However, that future is not guaranteed.
Manufacturers view outcome based pricing as a path to stronger margins, recurring revenue, and long-term growth. Customers may see it differently. They may question why capabilities they once expected as part of ownership now require ongoing payments.
This creates a growing pricing dilemma.
The challenge is no longer convincing customers that productivity matters. Most already understand that. The challenge is convincing them that productivity deserves a separate and ongoing price.
As more industrial businesses follow John Deere’s lead, one question remains: will customers continue paying for productivity gains, or will they increasingly push back against the idea that those gains should come with an ongoing fee?
For business leaders, this trend deserves close attention because it may reshape how value is priced across industrial markets. For pricing teams, it highlights the growing importance of understanding how customers perceive ownership, outcomes, and fairness.
If your business is navigating similar pricing challenges, we can help. Reach out for insights and support on pricing strategy, value communication, customer willingness to pay, and the adoption of outcome based pricing.
Read This CEO Pricing Strategy To Improve Margin & EBIT
Are you a business in need of help aligning your pricing strategy, people, and operations to deliver an immediate impact on profit?
If so, please call (+61) 2 9000 1115.
You can also email us at team@taylorwells.com.au if you have any further questions.
